Key eDiscovery Case Law Review for First Half of 2017 - ERP Spain.com - España y América Latina

The best predictor of future behavior is relevant past behavior. Nowhere is that truer than with legal precedents set by past case law decisions, especially when it relates to eDiscovery best practices. This CLE-approved* webcast session will cover key case law covered by the eDiscovery Daily blog related to eDiscovery for the first half of 2017, what the legal profession can learn from those rulings and whether any of the decisions run counter to expectations set by Federal and State rules for civil procedure. Topics include: + How should objections to production requests be handled? + Are you required to produce subpoenaed data stored internationally? + Should there be a limit to fees assessed for discovery misconduct? + When is data stored by a third party considered to be within your control? + Should courts dictate search terms to parties? + How can you make an effective proportionality argument to address burdensome requests? + Can the requesting party dictate the form of production? + Does storing data on a file share site waive privilege? + If data is intentionally deleted, should Rule 37(e) apply? + Is circumstantial evidence of intentional spoliation good enough to warrant sanctions? + Should keyword search be performed before Technology-Assisted Review? Presenters Include: 
Doug Austin: Doug is the VP of Operations and Professional Services for CloudNine. At CloudNine, Doug manages professional services consulting projects for CloudNine clients. Doug has over 25 years of experience providing legal technology consulting, technical project management and software development services to numerous commercial and government clients. Julia Romero Peter, Esq.: Julia is General Counsel and VP of Sales with CloudNine. Julia received her J.D. from Rutgers Law School - Newark, and her B.A. in History with a minor in education from Columbia University - Barnard College. * MCLE Approved in Selected States